Friday, April 20, 2012

An Open Letter to Newt Gingrich

Dear Newt:

I'm going to be blunt.

When I stood in the booth in 2008 and entered my vote for McCain, I made a vow to myself that this would be the *LAST* time I voted "lesser of two evils" as I had for my entire adult life.

Though I didn't start as a supporter, seeing how the media and the RNC has abused Ron Paul caused me to research him and become a RP supporter.

It's painfully obvious now that he'll never be allowed to win, so (as much as it pains me to say it) I decided a while back that I was going to vote for Obama.

Why?
  1. I no longer believe we're going to be able to vote our way out of this mess.
  2. I could not in good conscience vote for anyone left on the "R" ticket - LEAST of all mitt-for-brains robamaney, who TPTB have apparently decided to ram down our throats whether we want him or not.
  3. A "RINO" win would lull the sheeple back to sleep ("We WON! What a RELIEF!") but do nothing to roll back all of the abuses of recent decades - we'd be better off with Obama because NOBODY would be able to sleep through what we know he will do!
  4. Since a total economic and governmental collapse seems inevitable, we might as well just get it over with!
Remember: I said I'd be blunt... !

Frankly Newt, I have a LOT of problems with your history. You have in the past been little better than any other RINO, and frankly I know when a politician is lying because HIS LIPS ARE MOVING, ergo I don't place ANY faith in campaign promises -- I've seen entirely too much.

I don't care what you say - I care what you DO, and HAVE DONE - and ALL of the Retardlicans, INCLUDING you, have done much that frankly makes me SICK!

So why am I here, writing this?

I just finished watching your "NRA" speech, and the things you said therein have convinced me that I *MAY* be wrong about you.

This was no small feat - and for those who haven't seen it, here's the speech to which I refer:

*IF* you really are who you now claim to be, then you may be the only candidate (with a realistic possibility of getting the nomination) who can prevent what appears to otherwise be inevitable.

*IF* you are serious about your support for the Constitution - ESPECIALLY the 2nd Amendment, then there are two things you need to do.

*IF* you do these things, I will not only vote for you, but I'll become a near-full-time proponent, and work to convince others to vote for you as well.

Further, I can pretty much guarantee that *IF* you do these things, you can guarantee a win in November by mobilizing MILLIONS like me who otherwise would have either just stayed home or cast a "let's get this crap over with" vote for The Enemy.

What are these two things?
  1. For those who may not know, Federal law allows private ownership of full-auto firearms, and always has, PROVIDED the buyer passes a full, extensive FBI fingerprint and background check and pays a transfer tax. In 1986 however, in an illegal and illegitimate manner, an amendment was stuck on to other legislation which LIMITED private ownership of any full-auto firearms made BEFORE (IIRC) May of 1986.

    The CSPAN video clearly shows that this was not properly done and thus should be moot and void, however it has become accepted law. All this has accomplished is to drive the cost of such arms through the roof by limiting ownership to a fixed and dwindling (as they wear out) supply.

    And (of course) the NRA has done NOTHING to undo this travesty, despite their vociferous promises at the time (speaking of "RINOs"...)...

    Further, if you are serious about your support for our Constitution and our 2nd Amendment, then you KNOW that the intent of the 2A was to ensure that We The People could possess the same arms used by our military - hence the "well regulated (ie: well trained and equipped) militia" statement which applies to ALL CITIZENS as we are still by law ALL part of the "unorganized militia."

    Both the FBI and ATF Directors have in the past gone on record saying that repealing this "post-86 ban" would have no effect on crime - only TWO lawfully-owned FA-arms have been used in crimes in the past ~80 years, and one of those was a cop who had access to departmental arms!

    Ergo, there is NOTHING to be lost by repealing this ban - and I GUARANTEE that a *GENUINE* promise to do so would earn you the votes of MILLIONS of firearms enthusiasts like myself!

    The second one is much easier to explain.
  2. *IF* you are serious about your support for our Constitution, then you should have no problems in promising to veto any legislation not accompanied by a clear statement referencing which part of the Constitution (and **NOT** the ridiculous "commerce" or "general-welfare" nonsense!) authorizes CONgress to take that action and pass that law.
THAT'S IT!

To recap, you can GUARANTEE yourself my full-time work on your behalf, along with MILLIONS of other votes, by promising to (1) repeal the unlawful "post-86 full-auto ban" and (2) only sign legislation with a Constitutional basis!

So... You're running out of time - and WE'RE WAITING!

Sincerely,

Dedicated_Dad

==================================================================

I don't know how to get this to him, or to get his attention, but if anyone should happen to read this who DOES know how to get it to him, I would welcome your assistance!

Should you need more info, or wish to engage in RATIONAL discussion, I can be reached at my user-name (dedicated_dad) at yahoo!

Thanks for taking the time to read - please pass this along!

Monday, April 16, 2012

Flash Mobs...

I decided to post another "light" post...

Saw this a few days ago - thanks to FreeNorthCarolina:

So... That got me thinking of something I'd seen a few days ago, about some OTHER Flash-mobs...

This one in NYFC:

Of course, not all NYFC Flash-Mobs are violent - this one was really cool! Worth the time to watch it all!

And... There's THIS - if you haven't seen it, it's WELL worth the 10 minutes!!

So... We move on to St. Paul, Minnesota:

Is this just an "inner-city" thing?


Well... Here's Picadilly Circus, in London:

Imagine - all those folks showed up to help a stranger propose?

Of course, not all London "mobs" are so peaceful, or so generous...

Nor is France immune to similar problems with "certain demographics":

By now, even my dead Grandmother is beginning to notice a pattern to this stuff!

More from Paris:

So... Why is it that when some folks get together, it ends up like this:

And THIS:

While in the very same city, others get together to do stuff like THIS:

Do they have these problems in Israel...

...as they do in Wisconsin?

Can South Korea...

...ever turn into Iowa?

Or Singapore...

...into Philadelphia?

What is it that separates Brazil...

...from Upper Dary, PA?

How is Dubai so completely different...

From Detroit?

Or Lison...

...from Milwaukee?

Are kids in Italy REALLY so much more civilized...

...than kids in Miami?


Are Nederlanders somehow more equipped to channel their aggression in a positive direction...

...than folks of a similar age in Dallas?

Why is it that when SOME folks get together, EVEN IN THE US, the result is so utterly BEAUTIFUL that it brings tears to your eyes...

...or folks in Belgium put a smile to your lips from a whole continent away!

I thought perhaps it was environmental, except... When ONE group "mobs up" at Mall of America, it looks like this...

...while another group MEETS IN THE SAME PLACE to do THIS:

What am I missing?

Why does one group of people seem to consistently do things like this...

...while another seems to consistently do things like THIS?

Whether it's Denver...


...or Las Vegas...

...Madrid...

...Australia...

...or South Africa, the pattern of violence and lawlessness from one group...

(WARNING: DISTURBING! - for more evidence, click through to YT and check out "related")

...and cultured, artistic fun from another...

...seems to hold up around the world!

Now, before you jump off calling me "racist" or other idiotic names - the refuge of the intellectually bankrupt when they've got no argument - anyone who's been paying  attention MUST have noticed that there were "black people" in most of the "positive" videos, and whites in most (or, at least MANY) of the more horrid ones.

Still, the pattern is undeniable!

Although the simple fact that there are differences in the races is undeniable, I remain convinced that these differences are due to CULTURE. It should be obvious that the black man who sang the  opera-tenor solo wasn't raised in "'da Hood"on a mental-diet of 50-cent or NWA. The couple in Handel's Messiah clearly wasn't influenced by peer-pressure to "stop actin' WHITE."

Like I said: CULTURE!

When the predominate culture of the group is one seeking to bring beauty, beauty gets brought.

Ugly unfortunately seems to predominate in those who SHOULD have the most to be thankful for! - after all, no matter what might have happened to their ancestors, THEY have never been forced to work a day in their lives! Those living upon the generosity of other people are most likely to target those same people to despise and abuse at every opportunity.

What created this culture?

More importantly, how do we change it, and FAST?!

How do we stop the current regime, its race-pimping sycophants and the Propaganda bureau (AKA "Mainstream Media") from continuing to pour fuel on the fire?!

The pressure-cooker is rattling in a way it has not in 150 years.

How do we stop it before it blows?!

If these "teens" keep on, someone is going to kill a bunch of them in perfectly-legitimate act of self-defense! By the time the LSM gets done with it, said victim will be made out to be an even bigger bogeyman than Jorge Zimmerman, and "those poor dead babies" will be choir-boys who were just minding their own business, trying to get some skittles and tea!

If the "race war" they're all pushing for ever actually COMES, I fear literal MILLIONS could die - and that's the LAST thing we need!

God help us... and God Save Our Republic!!

Friday, April 13, 2012

SHAMELESSLY...

... stolen from commenter "Ignatz" at "JustOneMinute" (pops)

""Hmm, a Dem wants to string up a non white apparently defending himself in the South.

Stop me if you've heard this one."

I LLOLed...

DD

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Damn DUST!

I've got a few posts percolating, but to be honest at this point I just don't feel like writing them.

I've spent the last couple of years focused on this gigantic locomotive that's screaming down the tracks, this immense Leviathan coming to destroy everything that matters to me.

Tonight I sat down to look for something I needed to support one of the aformentioned posts, when I stumbled over what follows... I misspelled my search term - something that rarely gets past me - otherwise I'd never have seen it.

This is probably the coolest thing I've seen in years!

Now, damnit, it would appear there's something in my EYE!


Why *YES*, Father!

I hear You LOUD AND CLEAR!

THANK YOU! - most especially for Henry!

===========================================================

I'm going to go put on my own headphones and crank up the volume. While I'm at it, I'm going to enjoy a fine cigar, and probably crack that bottle of single-malt that's been gathering dust in my cupboard for MUCH TOO long a time.

The Republic will still be going to hell in a handbasket when I'm done, our race-baiter-in-chief will still be polluting the office he's not fit to hold, and the rest of his evil cohort will still be busily working their evil...

The bottom line is that I need a recharge a hell of a lot more than anyone needs to read my ravings, so...

I'll see you when I see you - probably not until my new LT-keyboard arrives so I don't have to "Ctrl+V" every time I need to type a letter "b"......

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Zimmerman's "47 calls to 911 about black people in the last month"

We've all heard about Zimmerman's calls to 911 - more of the race-pimp/media narrative designed to make him seem like a racist lunatic.

No surprise - a simple analysis of easily available info (the 911 reports published by the Sanford PD) - shows that this is BS too.

By my count, he made 45 calls - not in "the last month" but since 2004 -- in EIGHT YEARS.

But... Weren't they all about black people?

NOPE!

NOT EVEN *CLOSE*!

The calls that were about "suspicious" people - 12 of them - included 7 about WHITES (one of which also included a hispanic) and only FIVE were about blacks!

But... Didn't he call about a little KID!
Why, actually - yes! Yes he did! - but *NOT* as we've all been told!

His call was to ask for a "welfare check". No - not THAT kind of "check" you idiot - he called because he saw a little kid alone on a busy road with no adult supervision.

HE CALLED BECAUSE HE WAS WORRIED THAT THE CHILD MIGHT GET HURT.

The BLACK child.

What an evil racist, huh?! (rolleyes)

The rest of his calls were various "good citizen" calls. A couple about dangerous potholes, a couple about people breaking into the complex pool and "clubhouse", a few asking them to check on his neighbors' property when they left doors open and such-like.

In ONE of them, he called the cops on his black NEIGHBOR!!

well, actually to report that someone was breaking into his black neighbor's HOUSE.

The police actually caught the miscreant (a young, black male, just for the record...) in the act as a result - the only "solved" burglary among the rash of them to happen in the area recently...

Oh - and this black neighbor has gone on record to SUPPORT Zimmerman!!

Bottom line: Just like everything else about this case, the TRUTH paints a VERY different picture than the BS we're all being sold by those who are SUPPOSED to be keeping us "informed"!

Face  it: If *I* can do this, so can the media!

So why do they CONTINUE to get this SO TERRIBLY WRONG??!!

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

UPDATE re: Trayvon Martin


UPDATE:

For those claiming the "gangsta" pics aren't the same Trayvon, I'm sorry to have to be the one to break it to you, but...

You've been lied to  -- again.

And YOU FELL FOR IT, -- AGAIN!

We know Trayvon was known as "Slimm" -- a bit more sleuthing turns up a "twitpic" account "no_limit_nigga" for someone calling himself ...

Wait for it...

"Slimm..."

And guess what image "Slimm" chose for his "profile" pic?



You just can't make this stuff up!

And just to save us all the inevitable "some white ray-cist made that page just to make poor Trayvon look bad", well ...  Look closely.  The oldest image was posted 145 days ago.  I'm also willing to bet that the young lady bears a striking resemblance to young Trayvon's girlfriend...

So, in short we have two possibilities:
(1) 145+ days ago, someone decided that young Trayvon would become famous and wanted to make sure some young wannabe-gangster's pictures were wrongly associated with him...
or
(2) You've been lied to once again in the ongoing attempt to "white-wash" the young man's reputation.

Pro-tip: The smart-money's on "(2)"...

PS: For more evidence, we note that someone calling himself "Skee Dollas Nickuhs" ("@MrMonopolSKEE" - who has since set his Twitter to "private/protected") had the following to say:


Ergo, unless this (nonexistent) "Other Trayvon" has also succumbed to some fatal mishap.....

I'd say that pretty much wraps it up...

/Update

Sunday, March 25, 2012

SOME truth about Trayvon...

UPDATE:
See update on pictures here!


And 

The TRUTH about "all those calls to 911" here...
/:UPDATE
===========================================================
Since our entire country is about to tear itself apart over a hispanic/black/jew killing a black boy, I decided to sit down tonight and do a little digging.

What I found didn't really surprise me -- I'm about the world's biggest cynic -- but it IS pretty staggering in a sick sort of way...

First the "concensus narrative":

Poor little Trayvon - choir-boy extraordinaire, and candidate for sainthood - was chased down and murdered by a racist white man for the "crime" of walking to the store to buy a bag of skittles for his beloved little brother.

The police TOLD the racist murderer not to follow Trayvon, but he continued, and wasn't satisfied until he'd MURDERED this innocent little child.

Naturally, they also trot out heart-melting pictures of the innocent child, to be sure nobody misses the fact that he was someone SPECIAL whose life was cut tragically short by the twin horrors of racism and guns.

What's worse, the evil, racist redneck cops in the Florida town where this tragedy happened chose to let the murderer walk free - after all, he was white and the dead "child" was black!

At this point, 99% of the black community is screaming for "Zimmerman"'s head on a platter, thanks in large part to media pandering and the usual bevy of race-hustlers and pimps. Even King Hussein The First, has chosen to fan the flames by claiming "If (he) had a son, he'd look like Trayvon".

You'd THINK that black folks ESPECIALLY - given the long history of "their people" being lynched without benefit of due process - would be against the whole meme - but obviously you'd be WRONG.

Unless you've been hiding under a rock, you've heard all that so many times that it's become TRUE - though it's nearly all a pack of sickening LIES!

Here's what I've learned...

First of all, Trayvon was in this "strange neighborhood" because he'd been sent there by his Momma -- sent to stay with his DADDY for a bit so Daddy could "straighten him out" during a week-long suspension from school.

Though nobody will say what he did to get himself suspended, one thing is sure: It was relatively SERIOUS if it earned him a weeklong suspension... For Mom to call on DAD to "straighten him out" - thus admitting SHE COULDN"T HANDLE THE KID - is also telling!

Then there's Trayvon himself...Here's the kid we've all been told was so brutally murdered:


As it turns out, that picture is about 5 years old!
In reality, THIS is the "Trayvon 'SLIMM' Martin" who was shot on that fateful night:


Gosh! Gold "grille", "saggin' pants", obscene gestures... Not quite the choir-boy we've all been crying over, huh?

UPDATE:
SEE MORE ON PICTURES HERE!
/:UPDATE

Then there's the fact that - in another image from his Facebook page - young Trayvon apparently self-identified as a "MADE NIGGA" - meaning he'd been officially accepted into a "gang."



Which gang? I'm not sure, but clearly it has a "Waters Avenue" "set" - and "Slimm" made a claim to be in it!

Lest you fall for the claims of "That's a DIFFERENT Trayvon Martin" - note that even the pic his family chose for his "funeral handout" had a similar "tough guy" vibe - also delivered in a red font.

Even further, I'd bet a paycheck that the "skull and crossbones" came from the same "graffiti" font-set he used for his "Made..." announcement above! - but I digress...

EDIT: 4/9/12: It now appears there are significant reasons to doubt the "white-hat" pics are THIS Trayvon.
It appears I was likely fooled - if so, Mea Culpa.


In any case, there's no question WHATSOEVER about who THIS is, so...




The point stands.
/EDIT

Do a simple Google Image Search for "Trayvon Martin" and look at what pops up. Scroll on down and look -- you'll find all sorts of *OLD* pictures of him (the bastards even go so far as to break out the photo from his "Kindergarten Graduation") -- but you'll find the only sites showing the pics I found above are places like "StormFront"...

EDIT: 4/9/12: FOR THE SLOW KIDS - I found "stormfront" through a Google search. My point in naming them was the fact that THOSE WHO WE TRUST TO TELL US THE TRUTH ARE HIDING IT. That bigots like the SF bunch are telling the truth doesn't negate the value of said truth - even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while! I'd be more than happy to point out HuffPo if THEY ever decided to tell the truth - for now, we're all stuck with the SF bunch. /EDIT

EVEN THE "POSTER BOY" SHOT HAS BEEN ALTERED TO MAKE HIM LOOK MORE INNOCENT!!

Lastly, note that the Police Report from the night of the shooting - which took its info from his two-year-old ID - listed him as 6-0, but the Trayvon who was shot was was in fact a six-foot-two and 180+ pounds football player - not the innocent little boy being plastered all over!

Zimmerman OTOH is 5-9, and obviously obese. Further, he was - when police arrived at the scene - bleeding from his nose and from the BACK of his head. He also had grass all over the wet-back of his shirt, which corroborates

the eyewitness' statement that he'd been on the ground on his back being beaten by the poor choir-boy Trayvon prior to his firing his weapon.

Ok ....So maybe Trayvon wasn't the choir-boy we've been led to believe - but that doesn't give Zimmerman the right to kill him!After all - Zimmerman continued chasing Trayvon after the police told him to stop!

As it turns out, THAT is a lie too!
If you listen to the whole 911 call, you'll find two things:
(1) The dispatcher didn't tell Zimmerman "Don't do that" (follow Martin) - he said "We don't NEED YOU TO DO THAT"... The former is an order, the latter a simple attempt to limit liability!
(2) Even more importantly - contrary to the ongoing "concensus narrative" - ZIMMERMAN - upon being told he didn't NEED to follow Martin - STOPPED FOLLOWING HIM!!

You can tell this because he stopped wheezing when he was no longer hurrying trying to keep up with a running Martin - but also because he told the dispatcher that Martin had "disappeared", and that he (Zimmerman) was going to return to his truck!!

Listen for yourself:

Now...

I believe we've pretty well established that Trayvon wasn't who we've been told he was.
It's undeniable that they've gone WAAaaay 'round the bend to make poor little Trayvon look like a little boy instead of the LARGE, ATHLETIC *MAN* he really was.
I believe it's undeniable that the "narrative" of the whole thing is also twisted, through selective "editing" of the 911 tape.

What about those racist cops? They STILL should have arrested Zimmerman, right?

Well, as it turns out, that's wrong too!

See, Florida law PROHIBITS police from arresting someone who appears to have been acting in self-defense!

Further, it was *NOT* the cops, but the DISTRICT ATTORNEY who made the decision not to charge Zimmerman -- a decision he made *AFTER* reviewing all the evidence and the testimony of all the witnesses -- which just happens to match what Zimmerman has claimed from the beginning!

Zimmerman says he was returning to his truck when Martin ATTACKED *HIM*!
He says he began screaming for help, and when he was on the ground being beaten to death he finally drew his weapon and fired in self-defense!

This statement matches the story from multiple eyewitnesses, and even a SEPARATE 911 tape where Zimmerman can be heard screaming for help in the background!

But... Wasn't that Trayvon screaming for help?!

NOT ACCORDING TO MARTIN'S OWN FATHER - who told cops (after listening to the tape) "That's not my son." !!

FURTHER, ALL THIS HAS BEEN KNOWN FOR AT LEAST A WEEK!

[url=http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigation/docs/Zimmerman_Martin_shooting.pdf][b][u]Here's a letter from the "City Manager" to the public, trying to calm things down"[/u][/b][/url] - it also has some interesting facts...

Lastly, here's a page with links to several relevant documents and videos...

In short, EVERYTHING you've been told about this case is a lie.

Every "fact" has been twisted, pictures deliberately altered, and the whole thing deliberately manipulated in order to foment and fan the flames of racial tensions.

The race-pimps and hustlers have done THEIR sickening best to wind up as many as possible, and they've been aided by everyone from the media to the White-House.

The ONE QUESTION WE MOST NEED TO BE ASKING AT THIS POINT IS WHY??!!

The answer to *THAT* question may just tell us what we REALLY need to know!!

There *IS* one more thing to consider, here:
Where is O'Blamer's concern for the 10 black kids killed/49 wounded JUST IN CHICAGO, AND JUST THIS WEEK? WHAT ABOUT THE 1500 black babies murdered by their mother EVERY DAY?!

THEY don't matter - because THEY don't serve the AGENDA!!